Posts Tagged ‘j s bach’


 Powered by Max Banner Ads 

Adam Levy of The Honeydogs interview

The Honeydogs (Adam Levy, front/center)

One of the biggest cliches in the music business is “best-kept secret.” But when it comes to the Minnesota-based band The Honeydogs, the cliché is true. For more than 15 years, the ‘dogs have built a loyal fan base across the upper Midwest, who were drawn initially to the band’s country rock efforts. Over time, the band has evolved into a melody-making rock machine, and began garnering serious critical acclaim with 2003′s epic 10,000 Years, a concept album about a test-tube kid who goes from criminal to possible savior, in the midst of wars, genocide and other horrific acts of man. If that doesn’t sound like the usual rock fare, it’s because chief songwriter and vocalist Adam Levy isn’t your songwriter du jour. He’s not afraid to sing about the dark side or bring together musical styles as disparate as bossa nova and funk, R&B and J.S. Bach. And he’s one of this generation’s great writer of melodies, following the footsteps of Elton John, Brian Wilson and, yes, Lennon & McCartney.

The Honeydogs’ latest release – the six-song EP Sunshine Committee – finds Levy and bandmates getting back to roots and having a ball doing it. It’s a collection of songs that’s sure to leave listeners wanting more, and that’s just how Levy likes it.

Classic Rock Music Blog spoke to Levy about his musical background, songwriting influences, Sunshine Committee and more.

Your music draws from a wide range of influences. Did you collect records growing up?

My parents didn’t really have a gigantic collection – they had a handful of records – but they got  big airplay. Everything they had made a big impact on me. They had a copy of Herb Alpert & The Tijuana Brass – “Tijuana Taxi” – and I can’t tell you how much that record has entered into my consciousness. It might not sound like it in my music, but chord changes, melody – that stuff was just in my blood. The Beatles’ Rubber Soul, of course. There was a Charlie Parker record that we listened to constantly. We had a Bach fugue for the piano, record, that got played a lot. But they didn’t have like a lot of records – they just played those. And I listened to AM radio growing up, and I think the wonder of AM radio in the late 1960s and ’70s was the amazing diversity of musical styles that were in pop radio, at least for a long period of time. You’d get something that sounded kind of country, and something that was R&B, and something that was British Invasion-sounding – everything side by side – so it was like this cool soup of music that I grew up with. I really say AM radio, more than anything, as a kid, probably shaped my musical tastes.

And then I got introduced to KISS by a friend, and then I wanted to be a rock musician after that. Then another friend came over a couple months later – his father had died a couple years earlier – the most meaningful thing he got from his dad was his dad’s record collection, which was primarily ’60s records, everything from Frank Zappa to Hendrix, Beach Boys, Beatles and Stones. He brought over to my  house the whole Beatles’ catalog – or at that time in 1977, all the major-type releases, Capitol and Apple releases. So we sat there one night – in an overnight – and we listened to virtually every record. I think if you listen to every Beatles’ song  it takes like 10 hours – you could travel across the Atlantic Ocean and listen to the whole Beatles’ collection, or something. So we got pretty close; we stayed up into the twilight hours and listened to all of that music, and a lot of the songs I’d never heard before. I’d heard some of the hits on the radio as a kid, but it was the frickin’ clouds opened up. And after that, it was over. I went and got every Beatles’ record I could get. With every job that I had I started buying Rolling Stones’ records, and then it was The Who and Hendrix and Bob Dylan, and just went through the whole kind of pantheon of great singers/songwriters/rock musicians of the ’60s. And, of course, I discovered the punk rock stuff, and The Clash and Elvis Costello. I got into soul – Sly & The Family Stone, James Brown, Aretha Franklin. I went to college and just kept collecting, so I’ve got a pretty sizable record collection – great classical stuff, jazz and lots of rock stuff. I also inherited from my wife’s late grandfather, his country collection, which was a really big record collection of mostly ’60s country records. So, that’s my story in a nutshell as far as my musical upbringing.

After being exposed to all those types of music, if you were to teach a songwriting course, what records or artists would be required listening for your students?

I teach a songwriting class now, so I get to kind of tell them who I think, in my canon is at least, on the list of great songwriters. I’d say the absolute, you can’t really understand the history of songwriting – popular songwriting – without this group of songwriters would be Burt Bacharach, Jimmy Webb, Neil Young, Bob Dylan – of course – Lennon/McCartney, Elvis Costello, Holland/Dozier/Holland, Randy Newman, Harry Nilsson, Merle Haggard and Hank Williams. There’s just so many.

Jimmy Webb is a guy who sort of hides in the shadow, but look at the songs he’s written.

Right, I know. He wrote a great book on songwriting, which has sort of become canonized – by folks that teach songwriting classes – because it’s so amazing. I just feel like the guy – whether or not you like or agree with his sort of formulaic description of how songwriting is done – but the way he talks about music, he’s just so passionate about it. And, yeah, he’s written some brilliant, beautiful pieces of music.

It’s one thing to be influenced by The Beatles – you can listen to Beatles’ records over and over again – but it’s another to actually write memorable melodies. How do you continually come up them?

I think that melody is probably the most important thing for me. I guess, in some ways, I consider myself sort of an evolved lyricist. I think at one point I just wrote things that were really simple that just meant something to me that I knew would communicate with people, just because they were so basic. Over time, I think there’s become a greater degree of subtlety in how I write lyrics. But I think the thing I probably feel the strongest about, or put the most work into, is crafting – I hate that word – just creating melodies, singing melodies that are memorable. Things I like that feel good coming out of your body, you know? There are some melodies that just – there’s a kind of harmonic convergence between the sentiment that you’re singing and the chords that you’re playing and the melody, and it’s just like, almost transcendental. I wouldn’t say that about every song I’ve wrote, but there’s like a few songs where there’s this feeling that you have like, “How the hell did that happen? It wasn’t me.” It’s sort of like you’re channeling. A lot of times there is kind of like a trance state that I get into, and I’m sure that other songwriters do, too, where you lose touch with time when you’re coming up with melodic ideas – at least I do. Sometimes it takes a while to find them, but then you just get into this trance state, and it’s like, “Wow!” Time and space and everything else disappears, and nobody can disturb you; nobody can get your attention – you’re just so in the moment.

I would assume that you were in the trance when writing “Last War Lullaby”? I think that song has some of your strongest melodies and musical ideas. It has a starkness but yet a beauty about it.

That certainly wasn’t a song that I wrote in one sitting, but I’d say that’s a song that I spent a lot of time in the conceptual stage, thinking, “How can you create a sonic landscape for war when you’ve never experienced it? How can you create something that’s compelling and at once beautiful, but also telling a pretty dark tale about human behavior? How do you do that without romanticizing it or something?” So, yeah, that’s a song I feel very proud of, how it turned it. That was one of those songs where the band just couldn’t even imagine – when I tried to play it on guitar for them – they’re like, “I don’t get it. What is this beast?” And so, as you can probably imagine, recording it was painstaking, but I think the results turned out good. It was one of those songs that was in my head, you know? It didn’t matter that I couldn’t really do it, physically, myself. I heard this going on, so…

Do you have a go-to guitar or a place to escape when you’re struggling with a musical idea?

I don’t have one particular spot. I do have a backyard now with an amazing garden. The gentleman who is renting me his place, he’s a professional urban landscaper, and so now I’ve got this almost Asian garden in the middle of the city. It just feels like I’m in some other place – that really gets me out of my head in a way that just sitting… because most of the time when I’m writing music, I can do it anywhere. I could be sitting on my bed; I could be sitting at the kitchen table, which is usually the most comfortable place to do it – or the couch, or whatever. I never thought about this really, but I think there’s different stages of the songwriting process when I tend to go to certain places to work on something. I’m not gonna sit on the couch and work on lyrics. I’m gonna sit on the couch and sort of lay back and come up with chord ideas and melodies. When I really want to start writing words down, I gotta get into that, sort of, getting-the-work-done position – in a chair, where you’ve got a pen in hand. I tried to write with computers – I’ll usually handwrite stuff and then I’ll go and write on the computer when it starts coming together, but I haven’t been able to compose well on a computer. So I’m pretty old school in that regard.

Your music has a lot of major 7th chords, going back to Seen A Ghost, I suppose. You obviously like that sound?

Yeah. I think probably the first song where I discovered that type of chord was “Your Blue Door,” from the second record, and I think I use it once on the very first record. But I realized the beauty of it – I didn’t really understand where I was getting it from, but then I started listening to a lot of Burt Bacharach and realized that’s kind of the beauty of his music – that really uplifting, kind of jazz palette-y sound.

You’ve often said that music is something you can’t stop doing. Pete Seeger recently released an album at 89 years of age. Can you imagine such musical longevity for yourself?

I do. I don’t know what it’s going to look like or sound like, but I’ve been doing it long enough now where I can’t imagine saying, “OK. I wrote my best song. Now I’m done.” There are people who dial it in at a certain point – their accomplishments have been so great that it’s all downhill for them. It doesn’t matter. They’ve had the accolades and the money – they’ve had this incredible life experience – so the drive to better what they’ve done and their art form isn’t so primal. I feel like I haven’t written my best song yet – I don’t always think, “OK. Now I’m gonna sit down and write my best song,” but I always know that I can do better. People have their favorite records, but I feel confident in saying that we’ve kind of pushed ourselves with each record to do something a little differently. Whether it’s constructing a melody or the way the phrasing happens or how I use my voice – whatever. That’s the exciting thing to me, to keep the ball moving.

Is there one Honeydogs’ song you feel best articulates your songwriting philosophy?

They’re all my babies, and some of them I like maybe a little bit more than others. But I guess, you asked about “Last War Lullaby,” that’s a song that seems to encapsulate a lot of different facets of what I like to do.

Tell me about recording Sunshine Committee at IPR (Institute of Production and Recording). You brought some of the students in to see how the recording process works and to help, too.

I was given the opportunity to teach a class in audio production – they call it the Capstone class, which is like a senior thesis. Students come in, and they get a real recording environment where they get to be a part of something. The instructors who get to do the class, get to pick whatever they want to do. They told me, “Do whatever you want. Record a Honeydogs’ record.” And I said, “You’re kidding me? You’re paying me to do this?” It’s like, is this a job or a heist? There were a lot of questions that the band had, because I was in the instructing position there was a sense that… I hadn’t really directed traffic with The Honeydogs in the past. I think I had from a musical and arrangement level, but not like mic-ing and all that kind of stuff, so it really kind of put me in the helm. The good thing was – there were a lot of things I didn’t really understand – I had a good engineer helping me in the classes I was teaching. The students were cream of the crop. Most importantly, was Peter Anderson, the drummer, has become a pretty amazing engineer and, I would say, producer. His ears are fantastic. He’s a great musician. And he’s just worked in some really high-pressure situations and knows now how to do things. I’d say Peter, in a lot of ways, taught the class as much as I did.

The class was on Friday, so we would do like a six-hour session. It always took like two hours to set up, and then you’d try a track for a few hours. Oftentimes, I didn’t even know what we were going to record when we got to school that day. A lot of these songs I was just finishing writing, so I just thought, “What the hell. The band has always operated best when they didn’t have a lot of time to digest material.” And it’s because they’re really good; everyone has really good first instincts – it’s infinitely more interesting to me to listen back to a record a few years later where you remember you actually shaped this whole thing in the studio. It wasn’t like a prefabricated thing that you beat into submission and then basically recorded this stiff thing. It’s like the studio allowed it to unfold and things that nobody thought possible happened, by accident.

There’s a lot going on in these songs, and you really got the mix and balance between the instruments right. And the vocals sound live, to the point where your breathing can be heard in spots. Did you notice that playing the record back?

Yeah. I think we spent a lot of time finding the right microphones, and as you become more comfortable with your vocal – there wasn’t a huge amount of comping going on in vocals. There were just times when I would do a take and it was on the right microphone, and we would just keep as much intact as we could.

As far as the overall mix, that’s all John Fields. He was so good and so quick with this stuff. I think he labored over a few of them, but he’s just gotten so good over time – his instincts are so great – plus, he understands me as a songwriter, and he understands what makes my voice sound good. Even if we had great microphones – a lot of times we had the rough mixes – I was like, “Geez, this just isn’t working,” and we’d give it to Fields. It would come back, and it was like a beauty makeover or something – you wouldn’t recognize it. It was just little, tiny things that he does that are so aurally significant.

You said the guys in the band didn’t have a lot of time to assimilate the songs before they were recorded. How much leeway do you give them to come up with their own parts and run with them?

On this one, a lot. I did demo all these songs out, and that’s how I write now. I don’t like to just play them on acoustic guitar. There will still be some songs that I don’t have everything fleshed out, but I like to sit down and write the song and have some sort of drum thing going, and bass, just to give me more of a sense of the completeness. Sometimes they’ll take my ideas, and sometimes they’ll re-fashion them into something completely different. Frankly, the ones where my mark was least noticeable in performance were the best ones.  And I really think this record, more than – in Amygdala, I thought it started really happening – but now, I love what other people are doing, without having to direct traffic and all, you know. That’s the fun thing, and part of that I would argue has to do with the fact that most of us are in a cover band – just a sort of “bowling night, fun band” that’s turned into a bit of a cash cow called Hookers And Blow. In that band we get to play, I would say, a lot of the blueprint songs that have influenced me as a songwriter, and just the great soul music. And everybody’s gotta learn some pretty intense stuff on these songs, you know? They’re harmonically complex; they’re songs that a lot of other people wouldn’t try to cover, and that’s sort of why Hookers And Blow is so fun: We just take some of the masterpieces… it makes everybody have to be pretty darn good – to hear the subtleties of these parts. We don’t replicate them like a museum or anything; we certainly do our own thing with them, but we try to keep the original model intact.

The song “Stash” has a lot of different grooves going on. That one sounds like it would be tough to get right. Some great drumming, too.

Yes. That was one, as I recall, Trent [Norton], our bass player couldn’t make it to the recording, and [keyboardist] Peter Sands couldn’t make it. So, we just sort of rocked, me and Peter Anderson – guitar and drums. It’s got a kind of bluesy, old rock, ’60s feel. And we just laid it down, just the two of us. Then all the other stuff kind of got stuck on top of it – the horns, the clavinet. It sort of feels like a cross between Sly & The Family Stone and Rubber Soul, or something.

Continuing with influences, the title track reminds me of Exile On Main St.-era Stones meets Big Star.

Wow! That’s great. Those are two bands that were huge influences on me. That song, though, was a different animal when I brought it in. I just played acoustic guitar. There wasn’t any of the electric guitar stuff on it; there wasn’t any idea of horns being on it. That one – just because of the sort of jam we did on it – I think it was just me, Trent and Peter Anderson, on drums. At its most basic form, it almost sounded like a late Velvet Underground song – that was sort of the direction we were gonna go. But then you add in a few electric guitars and horns, and before you know it, it’s like this soul/rock tune  that, yeah, it could have been an outtake from that era of The Rolling Stones or The Faces, or something.

“Fiber Optic Paramour” has a very strange effect, like a haunted choir, going on at the beginning. Was that some sort of keyboard wizardry?

It is. That’s a Chamberlain, a real one, which was an old, ’60s, one of the early sampling devices. That would be the choral voices. In fact, I think we layered like men’s choral, female choral and maybe even a children’s choral voice thing. I just wanted that chorus to open up, like the skies were opening up, just trying to convey that lyric.

“Balaclava” has what I call an Adam Levy-ism, where you often accent the last word in a line. I don’t really hear that from other singers. Is that something you consciously do?

Wow. Yeah, I guess there’s almost a slight dipping of the note on there. I wasn’t even aware I was doing it.

The first guitar solo on “Levers, Pulleys & Pumps” sounds like a charging elephant. What’s the story behind that?

[laughs] That’s an apt description. It was kind of an elephant charging around. That was Brian Halverson plugged into an organ speaker called a Leslie, which is where that Doppler-rotating speaker that – I don’t even know how to describe it. It’s like a helicopter taking off.

It’s sounds like something Adrian Belew would do.

Sure. Sure.

My only complaint about Sunshine Committee is that we just get six songs, and they’re six of the best songs the band has done. It’s got a great vibe to it.

Well thank you. That’s nice to hear. I think we – there’s a lot of other material right now, and the thought was… we approached this from two different directions. One was, if we make this really big record with all of these different sounds and angles, it might just be too much. Sometimes things get lost in that environment. One thing that’s unified the last couple records with The Honeydogs was just stylistically – I like to try on different hats and go to different places, and sometimes you lose people from that. It’s never deterred me from doing it, but I just thought, “What if we did this batch of tunes that just seem to be a bit more cohesive at some level?” And those six songs all sort of work together. These other ones that I’ve got are kind of in another realm.

Thematically or musically?

I think musically. I think they’re a little different structurally, and I just wasn’t ready to flesh them out yet. It seemed easier to take songs that I brought to the band and everybody came up with really cool parts easily. There wasn’t, really, a huge amount of labor that went into these songs. They’re kind of economical in a lot of ways – there are a few little curve balls that we throw in there – but it just feels like our straightforward rock. There’s nothing wrong with that. It’s just like embarking on something that’s a little more ambitious. I just wanted to give it enough sensitivity, and so I thought, Well, this will be a fun, little tease – do a short LP, and then we’ll hit them over the head with something different later.”

  • Share/Bookmark

Yngwie Malmsteen interview: Sweden’s Stratocaster master

Sweden’s Yngwie Malmsteen is one of rock’s most influential and original guitarists. When most guitarists were woodshedding to copy Eddie Van Halen’s tapping technique in the late ’70s and early ’80s, Malmsteen looked much farther back for his inspiration, to the unlikely world of classical music and composers such as Antonio Vivaldi, J.S. Bach and Wolfgang Mozart. As well, the Italian virtuoso violinist Nicolò Paganini proved to be a major influence on Malmsteen’s playing and approach to his instrument. Studying such maestros, Malmsteen gained a rich harmonic palette and dazzling technique that translated amazingly well into the world of hard rock. Along the way, Malmsteen basically created the “classical metal” genre, one that’s still going strong today.

I spoke with Malmsteen recently about music, recording, his latest album, Perpetual Flame, and his Custom Tribute Fender Stratocaster.

\

Is it true that you first arrived in the States with only your guitar and an extra pair of pants?

[laughs] Yeah. See what happened was, I was a musician in Sweden – I started [playing when I was 5 years old - I was in bands when I was like 9 or 10. I was really, really serious, you know? By the time I was 16 or 17, I was a professional - making almost nothing, but that was what I did. When I sent the tape in to Guitar Player - I just did because they said you could do it. I didn’t expect anything. All of the sudden, the phone was ringing off the hook. At the time they called me, they said, “You’ve got to come over to America.” I said, “America? What’s that?” Because that didn’t happen to a kid from Sweden. That wasn’t the thing to do. Later on, a lot of people did that, but at that time nobody did. At the time, I had a girlfriend and a cat and a band - everything. So, I didn’t know what was going to happen. But that’s actually a true story, yeah, and that’s actually the guitar that’s on the Rising Force album.

The classical connection has always been a big part of your music. Steve Hackett has said, “The ability to be able to detach from life is something that classical music offers that rock can't express.” Do you agree with that?

This is a really deep subject, so I’m going to elaborate if you don‘t mind. People have a very big misconception about Mozart and Bach, Beethoven and Vivaldi, and these guys. What they see now is guys in boxes playing scores. And obviously there are some superb orchestras. But you’ve got to remember that when those composers were alive, the way things were played then and composed and performed was completely different. That was today’s music. It wasn’t “classical” music then. That was that moment in time - it’s become classical now. Those guys improvised - those guys were musicians and composers and improvisers. The reason I say improvisers is because that’s a very important thing. I know a lot of people in the classical world, who play classical music today, and they cannot play an improvisation. But that’s how the great guys did it. Improvisation is the genesis of composition. If you don’t improvise, you can’t compose. If you tell most people who play in a symphony orchestra to compose something, they’ll look at you like you’re crazy. They’ll say, “I can’t compose.” They’re trained to play what’s on the paper. My sister is a classically trained musician, and you can put anything in front of her to play and she can play it - play it upside down. “Can you play this in C-sharp instead of B-minor?” She can play it no problem. But if I say, “Hey, can you improvise on this chord progression?” She probably could, but she wouldn’t want to, you know. She wouldn’t feel comfortable. I’ve done a lot of classical stuff because I’ve composed for symphony orchestras. I’ve done a lot of things where I’ve played with symphonies in Europe and Japan and China. They have one thing in common: They follow the conductor like little sheep. That’s perfect, because that’s what you’re supposed to do. It’s very, very interesting to play with those guys because they’re so good at that, you know? But that’s not the way classical music was done back in the day. Of course the ensembles had to play the written piece, but let’s say a piano concerto by Beethoven - before Beethoven went deaf, he used to perform. He would go into a cadenza for 20 minutes! He wouldn’t stop. He would improvise for 20 minutes, and then when he was done, the orchestra came in. These guys were different than most people think they were. And trust me, they’re my ultimate heroes.

You’ve got a guitar concerto under your belt now. Have you thought about writing something specifically for strings and guitar, maybe a duet or quartet piece?

Sure, sure I have. And I kind of do, because every time I compose - whether it’s for a rock band or a symphony - I do it the same way. Obviously, the orchestration is much more complex with a whole symphony. I’ve done things where I’ve re-arranged things - I do a duet for strings with my keyboard player, where I do like a Bach thing. And that’s sort of, to me, like what you’re talking about. Yeah, I do those things. To be honest with you, I’m in a place right now in my life where I really like to rock, man. [laughs]

Where does your musical inspiration come from these days?

It isn’t anything direct. It is so natural, and I swear to God that it doesn’t matter when or where – as soon as I pick the guitar up, it happens. It is composition automatic. It doesn’t stop. It’s like turning a faucet on. It’s ridiculous. And I don’t know exactly how to explain that. Sometimes I’ll come up with something, and it’s gone as quickly as it was there. If I don’t have tape running, it’s gone forever. That’s how it works for me. I don’t know how it happens, but it does.

I also write all the lyrics. And lyrics are completely different. There I draw a very strong influence from books, film, real events and feelings. My car [laughs] – whatever. So that inspiration can come from a lot of different things. But I don’t want to try to explain the music, because that’s like a magic show.

\

Perpetual Flame was made in sort of an old school way, refining the songs recording in between touring. What did you like about that approach?

It wasn’t by design, it’s just the way things happened. It did result in something I thought was really interesting, which is being the songwriter, the arranger, the producer – everything that I do – to come back at intervals was actually really good. To come away from it and then go back to it, I’d think, “Wow!” And you’d see it and hear it completely different, almost like an outsider. That was very good for me, because I think the album became more diverse, also more focused. Every time I came in, something appeared to me in a different way.

That’s an interesting approach, to hear your music like an outsider.

Of course, it’s not exactly like an outsider, but it’s much more so. Because first I write. Then I demo and cut the drums. Then I add the bass and guitars and keyboards. Then I write the lyrics, and then the singer comes in, then I start mixing and mastering. It’s all done in one go. You can get too close, you know.

You often call yourself a purist with regards to guitars, amps, cars and watches. What’s your feeling about analog versus digital recording?

I think, through a lot of trial and error, I realized a few things. First of all, digital recording falls and stands on one thing, which is the converters – the amount of bits and hertz that you have. At 96 kHz, 24 bits, you have very good resolution, but it seems that if you have an Apogee – if you have different converters – which it converts analog to digital and digital to analog, because ultimately what you hear is analog in the end. You have to pre-convert it… did you ever see a movie called The Fly? With Jeff Goldblum?

Yeah.

OK. It’s like that. You’re taking something, turning it into nothing and then making it into something again. That’s exactly what digital does. Whereas analog, it’s like an imprint; it’s a photograph with the sound – sound photograph on magnetic tape. Ultimately, this technology started out – I remember the first digital things, and they really sucked. It sounded like shit. It was very popular in the late ’80s for some producers to use these machines. I remember the first album I started using digital [technology] was Odyssey – that was 20 years ago. I didn’t think much about it at the time because we locked up two machines, one analog and one digital. We had two machines locked together. Then we did another album called Eclipse, which was done with digital all together – digital tape. Then after that, I was home in my own studio – I had the big reel-to-reel Studer 2-inch machines, and that’s what I stayed with for a long time. Then a friend of mine, Jeff Glixman – he’s a producer. He got me into the Otari Radar machine, which is a hard disc recorder, and I used to take the Otari and lock it up with a Studer 2-inch. I’d put them together and have the best of both worlds. It was a very good thing for a long time. When I record now, I record real, “live” drums. I don’t sample them. I don’t quantize them. I won’t sequence them. They’re real, live drums played by a real, live drummer.

What a concept.

[laughs] I like that. Yeah. Another thing: When I’m recording guitars, I have live Marshall stacks – on full! As loud as they go. And we put them in a room that’s just big enough for the walls not to be knocked out. [laughs] Yeah. I call it the “Room of Doom.” It’s an actual room with speakers, and I mike it up with some very nice AKG-442s, and I put them through a tube compressor and an equalizer-preamp, and then onto a digital hard disc recorder. And that comes out sounding like a monster, you know? Awesome.

\

What are the plans for your new record label, Rising Force, beyond your new album?

Well, it’s only been about a month or so. The new album, Perpetual Flame, is definitely the focal point, but there’s gonna be a lot more of my older stuff coming out. There’s gonna be some new live stuff coming out from this tour. And we’re gonna have other type of releases – books and all sorts of things. Maybe in the future, if we hear somebody really good we’ll sign them up. This is really just the beginning.

“Eleventh Hour” is one of my favorites on the new record. You recorded those strings in Istanbul?

Those guys are string guys, but I just showed them their parts – I had a guitar there – and I just said, “Here. Play, ‘dah, dah, dah, dah.’” And they had one cellist and like six violins and violas – and we double-tracked them a couple times – and it’s just so refreshing. No notes or paper. It was awesome.

You’ve said that the instrumental “Caprici Di Diablo” is the hardest thing you’ve ever played in your life. Apart from the speed of it, what makes it so challenging?

That’s a very good question. What makes it really challenging is the fact – you have A-major, a-minor, D-major, G-major. [hums chord progression] You have a chord progression that goes more than once. I left it very bare. It’s basically just a lead guitar and bass, so there’s nowhere to hide. I wanted it to be very daring, but I wanted it to be structured. I wanted to capture the moment. That was the last thing I did on the record – I kept saying, “Let’s do something else. Let’s do something else,” until there’s nothing left to do, and I had no choice. [laughs] I could go in and play it like a robot – I could play the chords, no problem. I mean, it’s physical, but I could do it. But I didn’t want that: I wanted to capture the moment – I did it pretty much in one take. I don’t like to go back and do it over and over and over, because it never gets any better.

“Live To Fight” has almost a medieval feel at the beginning and a cool groove, and the whole album has sort of an ancient vibe to it. Were you going for that?

You know, I didn’t really go for anything. It was just whatever new material came out, but coming back to it every time from a tour or something like that, I came back and it sounded really different. When it came to songs like “Live To Fight,” that’s when I decided it wasn’t going to work with the old singer. The songs were more or less totally finished when Tim [“Ripper” Owens] came in. I don’t think I had a specific idea, but it was just a natural evolution of things.

If you view the voice as an instrument, how would you describe Tim Owens?

Well, I think that he’s got the power and the range and the vibrato that I like – he’s got all those elements that I really dig, you know? And he sings all the material almost like perfect. It’s a very good match.

You changed singers in the middle of this project. It seems like you’ve had to defend yourself a lot for taking charge of your musical projects. Who knows better what you want than you?

It’s a toughie. What it is, is that I want to have the best guys to form the parts I like. I would probably have to say, even though it sounds a little pretentious, is that I work very much like a classical composer. You know in a Vivaldi concerto, the cellist doesn’t say, “Excuse me. Can I play an f-sharp here instead?” Because that’s the way it is, you know? It’s a funny thing.

Congratulations on your signature Stratocaster. Fender did an amazing job. The detail is stunning, right down to the bite marks.

Yeah. Well, imagine how I feel. They sent me one, and when someone opened the case – because I lent them the real one to copy – and I thought they had sent that one back. I swear to God, man. I’ve had that guitar for 30 years. It [the reproduction] smells the same. It’s sick. I said to [Fender master builder] John Cruz, “How did you guys do this? Is it some sort of alchemy? Is there witchcraft going on there?”

That’s quite an honor.

Oh my God. Yeah!

One of the great things about music is the passing of the torch. I’m sure a lot of today’s players were as inspired to pick up the guitar after hearing “Black Star” as you were from hearing Deep Purple’s “Fireball” or “Demon’s Eye.” That’s a cool circle to be in.

Yeah, absolutely. Not too long ago I went to see Black Sabbath in Miami – they’re called Heaven And Hell now. And I gotta tell you, man, these guys lifted the roof off the place. It was so fucking good. And you know who was opening?

Who?

Alice Cooper. He’s a good friend of mine, as well. Alice was amazing. These guys could be my dad, man. So there’s no reason to say, “OK, I’m done now,” after those shows. It was very cool, because those guys rock harder… I remember a lot of festivals here in the summer – I get to see a lot of bands. Sabbath and Alice Cooper were really rocking. So I hope I can keep it up like that, also. That’s what I want to do, anyway. [laughs]

  • Share/Bookmark

 Powered by Max Banner Ads 
Buy VerizonCell Phones and Save. | Thanks to Bank Rates & Reviews, CD Rates and UK Loan